Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Image classification
Stanford Baseline
AUC
0.9065
Source: paper fulltext
Image classification
YWW
AUC
0.9289
Source: paper fulltext
Image classification
Hierarchical Learning
AUC
0.9299
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

3 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Image classification Stanford Baseline AUC 0.9065 paper-derived No explicit refs
Image classification YWW AUC 0.9289 paper-derived No explicit refs
Image classification Hierarchical Learning AUC 0.9299 paper-derived No explicit refs

Large-scale Robust Deep AUC Maximization: A New Surrogate Loss and Empirical Studies on Medical Image Classification focuses on image classification.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

Optimization-AI/LibAUC is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open Optimization-AI/LibAUC

Reproduction Risks

  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Optimization-AI/LibAUC
best maintained
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (321 stars)

Stars
321
Last push
May 29, 2026 (22d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
25
Last push
Feb 2, 2023 (1234d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
1
Last push
Apr 26, 2025 (420d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Optimization-AI/LibAUC
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

LibAUC: A Deep Learning Library for X-Risk Optimization

Stars: 321
Forks: 43
Last push: May 29, 2026
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Community adoption signal (321 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected Optimization-AI/LibAUC as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 18, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · Optimization-AI/LibAUC has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open Optimization-AI/LibAUC

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Image classification

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.