Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

LAREX - A semi-automatic open-source Tool for Layout Analysis and Region Extraction on Early Printed Books is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

chreul/LAREX is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open chreul/LAREX

Reproduction Risks

  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

chreul/LAREX
best maintained
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
198
Last push
Jun 10, 2026 (8d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
OCR4all/LAREX
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (198 stars)

Stars
198
Last push
Jun 10, 2026 (8d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
  • Low confidence match

Best implementation now

chreul/LAREX
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

A semi-automatic open-source tool for Layout Analysis and Region EXtraction on early printed books.

Stars: 198
Forks: 33
Last push: Jun 10, 2026
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (198 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected chreul/LAREX as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 17, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · chreul/LAREX has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open chreul/LAREX

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Broaden model search

larex semi automatic open

Datasets

Broaden dataset search

larex semi automatic open dataset
Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote