Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
3 risk flags
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Reinforcement learning
gemini-2.5-pro-preview-03-25
miniF2F
37.70
Source: paper fulltext
Reinforcement learning
Kimina-Prover-Preview
miniF2F
68.85
Source: paper fulltext
Generation
miniF2F
Accuracy
80.74
Split: test
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

3 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Reinforcement learning gemini-2.5-pro-preview-03-25 miniF2F 37.70 paper-derived No explicit refs
Reinforcement learning Kimina-Prover-Preview miniF2F 68.85 paper-derived No explicit refs
Generation miniF2F Accuracy 80.74 paper-derived No explicit refs

Kimina-Prover Preview: Towards Large Formal Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learning presents a reinforcement learning method.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

moonshotai/kimina-prover-preview is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals.

Open moonshotai/kimina-prover-preview

Reproduction Risks

  • License metadata missing
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 95/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
370
Last push
Jul 10, 2025 (330d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
cmu-l3/llmlean
alternative
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Community adoption signal (210 stars)

Stars
210
Last push
Oct 10, 2025 (238d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
PAMF2/lawforge
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Strong

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
1
Last push
Jun 3, 2026 (2d ago)
CIDependencies

Risk flags

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Best implementation now

moonshotai/kimina-prover-preview
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Technical report of Kimina-Prover Preview.

Stars: 370
Forks: 24
Last push: Jul 10, 2025
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Partial overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (370 stars)
License –
CI –
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected moonshotai/kimina-prover-preview as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 5, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · moonshotai/kimina-prover-preview has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 330 days ago.
Open moonshotai/kimina-prover-preview

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Research context

Tasks

Reinforcement learning, Generation

Methods

Reinforcement learning

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.