Yeongmin Ko, Younkwan Lee, Shoaib Azam, Farzeen Munir, Moongu Jeon, Witold Pedrycz
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Perception techniques for autonomous driving should be adaptive to various environments. In the case of traffic line detection, an essential perception module, many condition should be considered, such as number of traffic lines and computing power of the target system. To address these problems, in this paper, we propose a traffic line detection method called Point Instance Network (PINet); the method is based on th ...
e key points estimation and instance segmentation approach. The PINet includes several stacked hourglass networks that are trained simultaneously. Therefore the size of the trained models can be chosen according to the computing power of the target environment. We cast a clustering problem of the predicted key points as an instance segmentation problem; the PINet can be trained regardless of the number of the traffic lines. The PINet achieves competitive accuracy and false positive on the TuSimple and Culane datasets, popular public datasets for lane detection. Our code is available at https://github.com/koyeongmin/PINet_new
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomous driving | tuSimple | Accuracy | 96.53 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Perception techniques for autonomous driving should be adaptive to various environments.
koyeongmin/PINet_new is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Official implementation from Papers with Code). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 178 GitHub stars.
Open koyeongmin/PINetHardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Only a historical official implementation is available.
Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.
Hardware requirements
No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
Official implementation from Papers with Code
koyeongmin/PINet_new
No additional community repositories detected yet.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Autonomous driving
Methods
None detected
Domains
Computer vision, Autonomous Driving
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.