KEMP-PIP: A Feature-Fusion Based Approach for Pro-inflammatory Peptide Prediction
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Pro-inflammatory peptides (PIPs) play critical roles in immune signaling and inflammation but are difficult to identify experimentally due to costly and time-consuming assays. To address this challenge, we present KEMP-PIP, a hybrid machine learning framework that integrates deep protein embeddings with handcrafted descriptors for robust PIP prediction. Our approach combines contextual embeddings from pretrained ESM protein language models with multi-scale k-mer frequencies, physicochemical descriptors, and modlAMP sequence features. Feature pruning and class-weighted logistic regression manage high dimensionality and class imbalance, while ensemble averaging with an optimized decision threshold enhances the sensitivity--specificity balance. Through systematic ablation studies, we demonstrate that integrating complementary feature sets consistently improves predictive performance. On the standard benchmark dataset, KEMP-PIP achieves an MCC of 0.505, accuracy of 0.752, and AUC of 0.762, outperforming ProIn-fuse, MultiFeatVotPIP, and StackPIP. Relative to StackPIP, these results represent improvements of 9.5% in MCC and 4.8% in both accuracy and AUC. The KEMP-PIP web server is freely available at https://nilsparrow1920-kemp-pip.hf.space/ and the full implementation at https://github.com/S18-Niloy/KEMP-PIP.
Results and benchmarks
Pro-inflammatory peptides (PIPs) play critical roles in immune signaling and inflammation but are difficult to identify experimentally due to costly and time-consuming assays.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural language processing | ProIn-fuse | AUC | 0.704 | paper-derived |
| Natural language processing | MultiFeatVotPIP | AUC | 0.686 | paper-derived |
| Natural language processing | StackPIP | AUC | 0.714 | paper-derived |
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Natural language processing
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.