Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- Stars
- 436
- Last push
- Feb 11, 2025 (492d ago)
Risk flags
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural language processing | LLaMA | val w/ ref? | 68.61 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judges is the primary contribution described in this paper.
baaivision/judgelm is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0). Dependency/environment manifests are present.
Open baaivision/judgelmEvidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 95/100, status high.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
[ICLR 2025 Spotlight] An open-sourced LLM judge for evaluating LLM-generated answers.
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/baaivision/judgelm.git
pip install -e . No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
No trustworthy dataset matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceNo trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceTasks
Natural language processing
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.