Jailbreaking Open-Weight LLMs via Random Embedding Perturbations
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
While open-weight models have enjoyed steady progress in capabilities and wide adoption across multiple domains, their safety remains an important concern. One key feature is the ability to refuse or deflect harmful, malicious, or insensitive prompts. In this paper, we expose safety vulnerabilities across six common open-weight LLMs of various sizes that consistently lead to harmful or unsafe responses on the JailbreakBench benchmark dataset. Our proposed attack, Perturbed Embedding Vector (PEV), is a simple and fast "jailbreaking" technique that is cheaper than prior approaches, which typically require gradient computations, per-prompt optimizations, or altering internal weights of the models. PEV just adds independent Gaussian noise in the embedding vector representations of the prompt, with no need for further manipulations. To generate unsafe responses, we repeatedly sample additive noise from this distribution. In our experiments, we observe that the average compute cost to get the first successful attack is up to an order of magnitude less than previous attacks. The first successful jailbreak on a new prompt typically arrives within one minute on every tested model, and PEV generates unsafe responses across all models for all prompts in JailbreakBench. No other tested method achieves such results, despite them taking longer to run. More broadly, we believe that understanding the behavior of LLMs under perturbations in the embedding vectors is an important research direction: while perturbations constitute a major security risk, they can also serve as a valuable tool for exploring the dynamical behavior of such models.
Results and benchmarks
While open-weight models have enjoyed steady progress in capabilities and wide adoption across multiple domains, their safety remains an important concern.
Benchmark evidence is limited
LLM evidence refs: paper.title, summary.hasReliableImplementation, guidance.mode
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 2 links.
Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct paper-linked artifacts found; showing strongest related artifacts
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- This is primarily a method paper. Reproduce it within a maintained framework baseline instead of chasing paper-specific repos.
- Start with framework-native implementations (e.g. PyTorch optimizer module, Optax, or Transformers training loops).
- Replicate the paper ablation settings first, then compare against modern baselines.
Time to first repro: a few hours · Best available artifact: ufca-llms/jua-4B-mixed
This is primarily a method paper. Reproduce it within a maintained framework baseline instead of chasing paper-specific repos.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation is currently available
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Datasets
No trustworthy datasets matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceSpaces
No trustworthy spaces matches right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXLLM evidence refs: paper.title, summary.hasReliableImplementation, guidance.mode