Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Invisible Image Watermarks Are Provably Removable Using Generative AI

Published Jun 1, 2023
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Invisible Image Watermarks Are Provably Removable Using Generative AI is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate
xuandongzhao/watermarkattacker

[NeurIPS 2024] Invisible Image Watermarks Are Provably Removable Using Generative AI

275 stars · 37 forks · Last push Jan 24, 2025 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

xuandongzhao/watermarkattacker is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open xuandongzhao/watermarkattacker
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected xuandongzhao/watermarkattacker as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

xuandongzhao/watermarkattacker
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
275
Last push
Jan 24, 2025 (579d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
deepvk/metr
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
22
Last push
Aug 19, 2024 (736d)

Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Zoky-2020/Security_and_Privacy_in_AIGC
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
17
Last push
Jan 10, 2025 (592d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • xuandongzhao/watermarkattacker has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 579 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open xuandongzhao/watermarkattacker

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/xuandongzhao/watermarkattacker.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

None detected

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Computer vision

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).