Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition
Results and benchmarks
Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
Interpretable Evaluation for (Almost) All NLP Tasks
194 stars · 15 forks · Last push Sep 22, 2025
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
neulab/InterpretEval is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present.
Open neulab/InterpretEval- License metadata missing
- Dependency manifest is missing
- Selected neulab/InterpretEval as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Includes CI workflow signals.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale risk
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 194
- Last push
- Sep 22, 2025 (338d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Dependency manifest missing
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 56
- Last push
- May 26, 2023 (1188d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (56 stars)
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Reproduction readiness
Major work
No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required
- neulab/InterpretEval has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
- You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
- Last push was 338 days ago.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- Aitslab/BioNLP
Confidence: Low · 56 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Models
No trustworthy models matches right now.
Search models on Hugging FaceDatasets
- xingkunliuxtracta/nlu_evaluation_data
3,699 downloads · 9 likes · Updated Jan 18, 2024
- recruit-jp/japanese-image-classification-evaluation-dataset
89 downloads · 8 likes · Updated Jan 22, 2024
Broaden dataset search
Spaces
No trustworthy spaces matches right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXData includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).