Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Interpretability, Then What? Editing Machine Learning Models to Reflect Human Knowledge and Values

Published Jun 1, 2022
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Interpretability, Then What? Editing Machine Learning Models to Reflect Human Knowledge and Values is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate
interpretml/interpret

Fit interpretable models. Explain blackbox machine learning.

6,924 stars · 786 forks · Last push Aug 17, 2026 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Matched via arXiv identifier search

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

interpretml/interpret is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open interpretml/interpret
Reproduction risks
  • Dependency manifest is missing
  • Selected interpretml/interpret as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

interpretml/interpret
best maintained
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
6,924
Last push
Aug 17, 2026 (8d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
interpretml/gam-changer
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
130
Last push
Oct 3, 2023 (1057d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
claire-devv/interpret-main
alternative
Maintenance
Stale risk
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
0
Last push
Feb 13, 2026 (193d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • interpretml/interpret has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open interpretml/interpret

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy models matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Curated Related

Broaden dataset search

interpretability then what editing dataset

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).