Integrating Deep RL and Bayesian Inference for ObjectNav in Mobile Robotics
João Castelo-Branco, José Santos-Victor, Alexandre Bernardino
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Autonomous object search is challenging for mobile robots operating in indoor environments due to partial observability, perceptual uncertainty, and the need to trade off exploration and navigation efficiency. Classical probabilistic approaches explicitly represent uncertainty but typically rely on handcrafted action-selection heuristics, while deep reinforcement learning enables adaptive policies but often suffers f ...
rom slow convergence and limited interpretability. This paper proposes a hybrid object-search framework that integrates Bayesian inference with deep reinforcement learning. The method maintains a spatial belief map over target locations, updated online through Bayesian inference from calibrated object detections, and trains a reinforcement learning policy to select navigation actions directly from this probabilistic representation. The approach is evaluated in realistic indoor simulation using Habitat 3.0 and compared against developed baseline strategies. Across two indoor environments, the proposed method improves success rate while reducing search effort. Overall, the results support the value of combining Bayesian belief estimation with learned action selection to achieve more efficient and reliable objectsearch behavior under partial observability.
Results & Benchmarks
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Autonomous object search is challenging for mobile robots operating in indoor environments due to partial observability, perceptual uncertainty, and the need to trade off exploration and navigation efficiency.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from this likely method family: Reinforcement learning.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
Tasks
Scientific computing
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
Computer vision
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.