Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviews

Published Oct 1, 2023
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviews is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate
neph0s/incharacter

Official code for the paper: InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviews (previously: Do Role-Playing Chatbots Capture the Character Personalities? Assessing Personality Traits for Role-Playing Chatbots)

101 stars · 9 forks · Last push May 27, 2025 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

neph0s/incharacter is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open neph0s/incharacter
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected neph0s/incharacter as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

neph0s/incharacter
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
101
Last push
May 27, 2025 (456d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
LC1332/Chat-Haruhi-Suzumiya
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
2,106
Last push
Aug 13, 2024 (743d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
LC1332/LC1332
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
3
Last push
Jul 4, 2024 (783d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • neph0s/incharacter has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 456 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open neph0s/incharacter

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/neph0s/incharacter.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy models matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

No trustworthy datasets matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

Curated Related

Broaden space search

arxiv:2310.17976 InCharacter demo

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).