Improving Exploration in Evolution Strategies for Deep Reinforcement Learning via a Population of Novelty-Seeking Agents

Q: How reproducible is "Improving Exploration in Evolution Strategies for Deep Reinforcement Learning via a Population of Novelty-Seeking Agents"?

Estimated time to first reproduction: a few days. Risk flags: Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified. No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.

Q: What framework is used to implement "Improving Exploration in Evolution Strategies for Deep Reinforcement Learning via a Population of Novelty-Seeking Agents"?

The primary implementation uses tf.

Published Dec 1, 2017

arXiv PDF

Researcher verdict

Starting point

Use as implementation starting point

Benchmark evidence

Missing

Not verified yet

Time to first repro

A few days

Plan setup time

Risk flags

Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold

Improving Exploration in Evolution Strategies for Deep Reinforcement Learning via a Population of Novelty-Seeking Agents presents a reinforcement learning method.

Benchmark evidence is limited

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Only a historical official implementation is available

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

uber-research/deep-neuroevolution · 1,667 stars · Last push Jan 8, 2024

Why this implementation

Confidence: low

uber-common/deep-neuroevolution is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Community adoption signal (1667 stars)). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 1667 GitHub stars.

Open uber-research/deep-neuroevolution

Reproduction risks

Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Only historical official repository was found: uber-research/deep-neuroevolution.
No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

uber-research/deep-neuroevolution

historical official

Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate
Stars: 1,667
Last push: Jan 8, 2024 (961d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

No push in 12+ months
No CI pipeline detected
No tagged releases

davidmacmillan/DeepLearningStudyGroup

alternative

Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited
Stars: 39
Last push: Aug 19, 2026 (7d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

No CI pipeline detected
No tagged releases
No Docker setup

reacho/research.mtne

alternative

Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate
Stars: 0
Last push: Mar 13, 2019 (2722d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

No push in 12+ months
No CI pipeline detected
No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days

Last checked: Aug 20, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

uber-research/deep-neuroevolution has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
Last push was 961 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.

Open uber-research/deep-neuroevolution

Hardware requirements

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/uber-research/deep-neuroevolution.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Validation caveat

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Repositories and ecosystem

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

uber-common/deep-neuroevolution Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 1,667 stars

Community adoption signal (1667 stars)
mike-bowles/hdDeepLearningStudy Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 292 stars

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

davidmacmillan/DeepLearningStudyGroup
Confidence: Medium

Papers, code, etc. for the Deep Learning Study Group, which has been meeting weekly since 2016. Meeting time - Tuesdays, 6:30 pm California time on Zoom. See README.md for Meetup, Zoom and Discord links.

39 stars · 6 forks · Last push Aug 19, 2026

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Models

arxiv:1712.06560 Novelty-Seeking Reinforcement learning

Datasets

arxiv:1712.06560 Novelty-Seeking dataset Reinforcement learning benchmark

Spaces

arxiv:1712.06560 Novelty-Seeking demo Reinforcement learning gradio

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

None detected

Methods

Reinforcement learning

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.