Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

IMPACTX: improving model performance by appropriately constraining the training with teacher explanations

Andrea Apicella, Salvatore Giugliano, Francesco Isgrò, Andrea Pollastro, Roberto PrevetePublished Feb 17, 2025
arXiv PDF DOI
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.

The eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) research predominantly concentrates to provide explainations about AI model decisions, especially Deep Learning (DL) models. However, there is a growing interest in using XAI techniques to automatically improve the performance of the AI systems themselves. This paper proposes IMPACTX, a novel approach that leverages XAI as a fully automated attention mechanism, without requiring external knowledge or human feedback. Experimental results show that IMPACTX has improved performance respect to the standalone ML model by integrating an attention mechanism based an XAI method outputs during the model training. Furthermore, IMPACTX directly provides proper feature attribution maps for the model's decisions, without relying on external XAI methods during the inference process. Our proposal is evaluated using three widely recognized DL models (EfficientNet-B2, MobileNet, and LeNet-5) along with three standard image datasets: CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and STL-10. The results show that IMPACTX consistently improves the performance of all the inspected DL models across all evaluated datasets, and it directly provides appropriate explanations for its responses.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
The eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) research predominantly concentrates to provide explainations about AI model decisions, especially Deep Learning (DL) models.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Computer science CIFAR-10 Accuracy 98.38 paper-derived
Computer science CIFAR-100 Accuracy 0 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 29, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Framework baselines

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

1

Citations

60

References

Tasks

Computer science, Econometrics, explainable AI, teacher explanations, image classification, tabular data classification, EfficientNet-B2, MobileNet

Methods

None detected

Domains

Artificial Intelligence

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers