Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation

Published Apr 1, 2023
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Computer vision CLIP Preference. 61.87 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

[NeurIPS 2023] ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-image Generation

1,702 stars · 92 forks · Last push Oct 29, 2025 · Apache-2.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

thudm/imagereward is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open thudm/imagereward
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected thudm/imagereward as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

thudm/imagereward
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale risk
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
1,702
Last push
Oct 29, 2025 (300d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
LemonTwoL/ReNeg
alternative
Maintenance
Stale risk
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
35
Last push
Dec 22, 2025 (246d)

Community adoption signal (35 stars)

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
0
Last push
Aug 9, 2026 (16d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • thudm/imagereward has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 300 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open thudm/imagereward

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/thudm/imagereward.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Curated Related

Datasets

Curated Related

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Computer vision

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).