ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation
Results and benchmarks
ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation is the primary contribution described in this paper.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer vision | CLIP | Preference. | 61.87 | paper-derived |
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.
Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 95/100, status high.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
[NeurIPS 2023] ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-image Generation
1,702 stars · 92 forks · Last push Oct 29, 2025 · Apache-2.0 license
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
thudm/imagereward is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0). Dependency/environment manifests are present.
Open thudm/imagereward- No CI workflows detected
- Selected thudm/imagereward as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale risk
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 1,702
- Last push
- Oct 29, 2025 (300d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Stale risk
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 35
- Last push
- Dec 22, 2025 (246d)
Community adoption signal (35 stars)
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Strong
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- Aug 9, 2026 (16d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Low confidence match
Reproduction readiness
Setup required
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
- thudm/imagereward has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
- Last push was 300 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
- No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
- No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/thudm/imagereward.git
pip install -r requirements.txt Repositories and ecosystem
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- LemonTwoL/ReNeg
Confidence: Low · 35 stars
- sdbds/qinglong-score
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
- kenjiqq/aesthetics-scorer
Confidence: Low · 48 stars
- Xerxemi/ImageReward-hyperIQA-bench
Confidence: Low · 2 stars
- SatellaSatella/ImageReward-hyperIQA-bench
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
- ygl123ygl/ImageReward
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Datasets
- datapointai/text-2-image-dpo-human-preferences
43 downloads · 1 likes · Updated Mar 30, 2026
- datapointai/text-2-image-dpo-human-preferences-full
32 downloads · 1 likes · Updated Mar 30, 2026
Broaden dataset search
Spaces
No trustworthy spaces matches right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Tasks
Computer vision
Methods
None detected
Domains
Computer vision
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).