Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few hours
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Identifying the ground state structures of point defects in solids is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

SMTG-UCL/ShakeNBreak is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open SMTG-UCL/ShakeNBreak

Reproduction Risks

  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

SMTG-UCL/ShakeNBreak
best maintained
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
125
Last push
May 11, 2026 (39d ago)
CIReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
smtg-ucl/doped
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Strong

Community adoption signal (261 stars)

Stars
261
Last push
Jun 14, 2026 (6d ago)
CIReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Best implementation now

SMTG-UCL/ShakeNBreak
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Defect structure-searching employing chemically-guided bond distortions

Stars: 125
Forks: 25
Last push: May 11, 2026
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Community adoption signal (125 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected SMTG-UCL/ShakeNBreak as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Ready to Run
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 18, 2026

Ready to reproduce

  • · Clone SMTG-UCL/ShakeNBreak and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
  • · CI pipeline detected — automated tests are in place.
  • · Last updated 39 days ago.
Open SMTG-UCL/ShakeNBreak

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/SMTG-UCL/ShakeNBreak.git
pip install -e .

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote