Identifying Self-Admitted Technical Debts with Jitterbug: A Two-step Approach
Results and benchmarks
Identifying Self-Admitted Technical Debts with Jitterbug: A Two-step Approach is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)
Only a historical official implementation is available
Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.
ai-se/Jitterbug · 3 stars · Last push Jan 29, 2023
Only historical official repository was found (ai-se/Jitterbug).
Open ai-se/Jitterbug- Only historical official implementation is available
- No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
- Only historical official repository was found: ai-se/Jitterbug.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 3
- Last push
- Jan 29, 2023 (1304d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- Mar 14, 2024 (894d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- Jan 4, 2022 (1694d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Reproduction readiness
Setup required
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
- ai-se/Jitterbug has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
- Last push was 1304 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
- No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
- No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/ai-se/Jitterbug.git
pip install -r requirements.txt Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- EliakimGama/my_jitterbug
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
- victory-hash/Jitterbug
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Datasets
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXData includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).