Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few hours
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

ICE-Score: Instructing Large Language Models to Evaluate Code is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

terryyz/llm-code-eval is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open terryyz/llm-code-eval

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

terryyz/llm-code-eval
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
79
Last push
Jun 16, 2024 (732d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
terryyz/ice-score
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
79
Last push
Jun 16, 2024 (732d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
2
Last push
Aug 1, 2024 (686d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

terryyz/llm-code-eval
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

[EACL 2024] ICE-Score: Instructing Large Language Models to Evaluate Code

Stars: 79
Forks: 10
Last push: Jun 16, 2024
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (79 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected terryyz/llm-code-eval as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

terryyz/ice-score
Stars: 79
Last push: Jun 16, 2024

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 15, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · terryyz/llm-code-eval has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · Last push was 732 days ago — expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open terryyz/llm-code-eval

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/terryyz/llm-code-eval.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

None detected

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.