Charles L. Wang, Cady Chen, Ziwei Gong, Julia Hirschberg
No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) for pathological speech remains underexplored, especially for Huntington's disease (HD), where irregular timing, unstable phonation, and articulatory distortion challenge current models. We present a systematic HD-ASR study using a high-fidelity clinical speech corpus not previously used for end-to-end ASR training. We compare multiple ASR families under a unified evaluation, analyz ...
ing WER as well as substitution, deletion, and insertion patterns. HD speech induces architecture-specific error regimes, with Parakeet-TDT outperforming encoder-decoder and CTC baselines. HD-specific adaptation reduces WER from 6.99% to 4.95% and we also propose a method for using biomarker-based auxiliary supervision and analyze how error behavior is reshaped in severity-dependent ways rather than uniformly improving WER. We open-source all code and models.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speech | Whisper-small | WER . | 19.78 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Speech | Whisper-medium | WER . | 26.91 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Speech | Parakeet-HD-Prosody | WER | 6.11 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Speech | Parakeet-HD | WER | 4.95 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Speech | Parakeet-HD-Phonation | WER | 6.07 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) for pathological speech remains underexplored, especially for Huntington's disease (HD), where irregular timing, unstable phonation, and articulatory distortion challenge current models.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (515 stars)
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Speech
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.