Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

How Good are Low-Rank Approximations in Gaussian Process Regression?

Constantinos Daskalakis, Petros Dellaportas, Aristeidis PanosPublished Apr 3, 2020
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

We provide guarantees for approximate Gaussian Process (GP) regression resulting from two common low-rank kernel approximations: based on random Fourier features, and based on truncating the kernel's Mercer expansion. In particular, we bound the Kullback-Leibler divergence between an exact GP and one resulting from one of the afore-described low-rank approximations to its kernel, as well as between their corresponding predictive densities, and we also bound the error between predictive mean vectors and between predictive covariance matrices computed using the exact versus using the approximate GP. We provide experiments on both simulated data and standard benchmarks to evaluate the effectiveness of our theoretical bounds.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
We provide guarantees for approximate Gaussian Process (GP) regression resulting from two common low-rank kernel approximations: based on random Fourier features, and based on truncating the kernel's Mercer expansion.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (aresPanos/dmgp_dfgp_regression).

Open aresPanos/dmgp_dfgp_regression
Reproduction risks
  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: aresPanos/dmgp_dfgp_regression.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

aresPanos/dmgp_dfgp_regression
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
3
Last push
Jun 8, 2020 (2269d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
arespanos/gurantees_gpr
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
1
Last push
Dec 13, 2021 (1716d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
aresPanos/DMGP_regression
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
6
Last push
Apr 6, 2020 (2332d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • aresPanos/dmgp_dfgp_regression has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 2269 days ago.
Open aresPanos/dmgp_dfgp_regression

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

  • arespanos/gurantees_gpr
    Confidence: High

    aresPanos/gurantees_GPR

    1 stars · 0 forks · Last push Dec 13, 2021 · Apache-2.0 license

  • aresPanos/DMGP_regression
    Confidence: Medium

    aresPanos/DMGP_regression

    6 stars · 1 forks · Last push Apr 6, 2020 · Apache-2.0 license

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).