Skip to content

Researcher verdict

Recommended implementation path available

implementation baseline
Benchmark trust: thin evidence
Quality tier: researcher ready

This page has evidence-backed benchmark findings and a concrete implementation recommendation anchored on IDEA-Research/Grounded-SAM-2. Use it as an implementation baseline, then validate benchmark parity before adapting it.

Why this page is still worth reading

  • A concrete repository path exists via IDEA-Research/Grounded-SAM-2, so this page can act as a practical starting point.
  • Reproduction risks are surfaced explicitly, which helps decide whether the paper is worth immediate prototyping.

Benchmark trust

Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.

Use this page as

Start here when you need the most practical implementation path quickly.

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.

Grounding DINO 1.5: Advance the "Edge" of Open-Set Object Detection is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: medium

IDEA-Research/Grounded-SAM-2 is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. License is declared (Apache-2.0). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open IDEA-Research/Grounded-SAM-2

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

LLM evidence refs: paper.title, paper.abstract, researcherSummary.reproductionRisks, guidance.riskFlags, researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot, evidencePack.repoSources, summary.hasReliableImplementation

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
1,086
Last push
Jan 21, 2025 (410d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (3302 stars)

Stars
3,302
Last push
Nov 11, 2025 (116d ago)
DockerfileReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • Low confidence match
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Moderate

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
3,302
Last push
Nov 11, 2025 (116d ago)
DockerfileReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected

Paper summary

AI-generated

AI-generated summary grounded in paper metadata and artifact signals.

Core claim summary is based on available metadata for Grounding DINO 1.5: Advance the "Edge" of Open-Set Object Detection. This page includes benchmark evidence for Computer vision on LVIS. Reproduction guidance focuses on implementation viability and concrete risk controls.

Key contributions

  • Core claim summary is based on available metadata for Grounding DINO 1.5: Advance the "Edge" of Open-Set Object Detection.
  • Benchmark finding: Computer vision on LVIS.

Implementation guidance

Use idea-research/grounding-dino-1.5-api first because deterministic ranking and extracted evidence align on implementation viability. Start with the repo setup path, then validate benchmark reproduction before adaptation.

Reproducibility notes

  • No CI workflows detected
  • No CI workflow signal detected.

Best implementation now

IDEA-Research/Grounded-SAM-2
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Moderate

Grounded SAM 2: Ground and Track Anything in Videos with Grounding DINO, Florence-2 and SAM 2

Stars: 3,302
Forks: 387
Last push: Nov 11, 2025
License: Apache-2.0
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Partial overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (3302 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker ✓
  • Selected IDEA-Research/Grounded-SAM-2 as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

idea-research/grounding-dino-1.5-api
Stars: 1,086
Last push: Jan 21, 2025

Reproduction path

Direct

Follow the direct implementation path

  1. 1

    Start with IDEA-Research/Grounded-SAM-2 and validate setup instructions in README.

  2. 2

    Reproduce the baseline result with the provided defaults before modifying hyperparameters.

  3. 3

    Log exact dependency versions and runtime environment for reproducibility.

Time to first repro: a few hours
No CI workflows detected

Additional implementations

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • IDEA-Research/DINO-X-API
    Confidence: Medium

    DINO-X: The World's Top-Performing Vision Model for Open-World Object Detection and Understanding

    Stars: 1,344
    Last push: Jul 23, 2025
    License: Apache-2.0
  • Grounding DINO 1.5: IDEA Research's Most Capable Open-World Object Detection Model Series

    Stars: 1,086
    Last push: Jan 21, 2025
    License: Apache-2.0

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

None detected

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.