Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

GRILLBot In Practice: Lessons and Tradeoffs Deploying Large Language Models for Adaptable Conversational Task Assistants

Published Feb 1, 2024
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
GRILLBot In Practice: Lessons and Tradeoffs Deploying Large Language Models for Adaptable Conversational Task Assistants focuses on instruction tuning.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Instruction tuning 2020 ) Accuracy 0.823 paper-derived
Question answering Llama-2-7b-hf Rouge1 0.154 paper-derived
Question answering Llama-2-7b-chat-hf Rouge1 0.230 paper-derived
Question answering t5-base * Rouge1 0.267 paper-derived
Question answering t5-base ROUGE-L 0.126 paper-derived
Question answering unifiedqa-t5-base ROUGE-L 0.236 paper-derived
Question answering flan-t5-base ROUGE-L 0.203 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (grill-lab/oat).

Open grill-lab/oat
Reproduction risks
  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: grill-lab/oat.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

grill-lab/oat
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
37
Last push
May 23, 2024 (824d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
grill-lab/wote
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
1
Last push
Feb 13, 2024 (924d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • grill-lab/oat has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 824 days ago.
Open grill-lab/oat

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

  • grill-lab/wote
    Confidence: High

    grill-lab/WoTe

    1 stars · 0 forks · Last push Feb 13, 2024

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Instruction tuning

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Instruction tuning Transformer Natural Language Processing

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).