Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
2 risk flags

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Anomaly Detection Multiple Time Series
SWaT
AUC
16.22
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Anomaly Detection Multiple Time Series SWaT AUC 16.22 paper-derived No explicit refs

Graph-Augmented Normalizing Flows for Anomaly Detection of Multiple Time Series is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: medium

zamanzadeh/ts-anomaly-benchmark is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. License is declared (MIT).

Open zamanzadeh/ts-anomaly-benchmark

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 95/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

D3-AI/Orion
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (1357 stars)

Stars
1,357
Last push
Jun 15, 2026 (3d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
  • Low confidence match
signals-dev/Orion
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (1357 stars)

Stars
1,357
Last push
Jun 15, 2026 (3d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
  • Low confidence match
sintel-dev/orion
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (1357 stars)

Stars
1,357
Last push
Jun 15, 2026 (3d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
  • Low confidence match

Best implementation now

zamanzadeh/ts-anomaly-benchmark
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Time-Series Anomaly Detection Comprehensive Benchmark

Stars: 277
Forks: 29
Last push: Sep 28, 2025
License: MIT
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (277 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected zamanzadeh/ts-anomaly-benchmark as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 17, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · zamanzadeh/ts-anomaly-benchmark has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 263 days ago.
Open zamanzadeh/ts-anomaly-benchmark

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Research context

Tasks

Anomaly Detection Multiple Time Series

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.