Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Transformer
SQuAD
F1
88.53
Source: paper fulltext
Transformer
Penn Treebank
Perplexity
9
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

2 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Transformer SQuAD F1 88.53 paper-derived No explicit refs
Transformer Penn Treebank Perplexity 9 paper-derived No explicit refs

GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers presents a transformer method.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

bentoml/openllm is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Community adoption signal (12334 stars)). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 12334 GitHub stars.

Open ist-daslab/gptq

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

ist-daslab/gptq
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
2,311
Last push
Mar 27, 2024 (794d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
eth-easl/deltazip
alternative
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Community adoption signal (35 stars)

Stars
35
Last push
Jul 21, 2025 (312d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Community adoption signal (110 stars) · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

Stars
110
Last push
Jan 11, 2024 (869d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

ist-daslab/gptq
Historical official
Stars: 2,311
Last push: Mar 27, 2024
  • Only historical official repository was found: ist-daslab/gptq.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: May 29, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · ist-daslab/gptq has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 794 days ago.
Open ist-daslab/gptq

Framework baselines

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Transformer

Methods

Transformer, Quantization

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.