Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

GitBug-Actions: Building Reproducible Bug-Fix Benchmarks with GitHub Actions

Published Oct 1, 2023
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
0
None detected

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
GitBug-Actions: Building Reproducible Bug-Fix Benchmarks with GitHub Actions is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong
gitbugactions/gitbugactions

⚙️ A tool for collecting executable code datasets with GitHub Actions ⚙️

23 stars · 7 forks · Last push Aug 11, 2026 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

gitbugactions/gitbugactions is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open gitbugactions/gitbugactions
Reproduction risks
  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
  • Selected gitbugactions/gitbugactions as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

gitbugactions/gitbugactions
best maintained
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
23
Last push
Aug 11, 2026 (14d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
nfsaavedra/crawlergpt
historical official
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
23
Last push
Aug 11, 2026 (14d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Ready to run

Ready to reproduce

  • Clone gitbugactions/gitbugactions and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
  • CI pipeline detected, so automated tests are in place.
  • Last updated 14 days ago.
Open gitbugactions/gitbugactions

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/gitbugactions/gitbugactions.git
pip install -e .

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Curated Related

Broaden model search

gitbug actions building reproducible

Datasets

No trustworthy datasets matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).