Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

From Imperative to Declarative: Towards LLM-friendly OS Interfaces for Boosted Computer-Use Agents

Yuan Wang, Mingyu Li, Haibo ChenPublished Oct 6, 2025
arXiv PDF DOI
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Computer-use agents (CUAs) powered by large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising approach to automating computer tasks, yet they struggle with the existing human-oriented OS interfaces - graphical user interfaces (GUIs). GUIs force LLMs to decompose high-level goals into lengthy, error-prone sequences of fine-grained actions, resulting in low success rates and an excessive number of LLM calls. We propose Declarative Model Interface (DMI), an abstraction that transforms existing GUIs into three declarative primitives: access, state, and observation, thereby providing novel OS interfaces tailored for LLM agents. Our key idea is policy-mechanism separation: LLMs focus on high-level semantic planning (policy) while DMI handles low-level navigation and interaction (mechanism). DMI does not require modifying the application source code or relying on application programming interfaces (APIs). We evaluate DMI with Microsoft Office Suite (Word, PowerPoint, Excel) on Windows. Integrating DMI into a leading GUI-based agent baseline improves task success rates by 67% and reduces interaction steps by 43.5%. Notably, DMI completes over 61% of successful tasks with a single LLM call.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Computer-use agents (CUAs) powered by large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising approach to automating computer tasks, yet they struggle with the existing human-oriented OS interfaces - graphical user interfaces (GUIs).

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 29, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Computer science, Suite, Focus (optics), Task (project management), Human–computer interaction, Key (lock), Abstraction, Programming language

Methods

large language models

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers