Fréchet Radiomic Distance (FRD): A Versatile Metric for Comparing Medical Imaging Datasets
Nicholas Konz, Richard Osuala, Preeti Verma, Yuwen Chen, Hanxue Gu, Haoyu Dong, Yaqian Chen, Andrew Marshall, Lidia Garrucho, Kaisar Kushibar, Daniel M. Lang, Gene S. Kim, Lars J. Grimm, John M. Lewin, James S. Duncan, Julia A. Schnabel, Oliver Diaz, Karim Lekadir, Maciej A. Mazurowski
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Determining whether two sets of images belong to the same or different distributions or domains is a crucial task in modern medical image analysis and deep learning; for example, to evaluate the output quality of image generative models. Currently, metrics used for this task either rely on the (potentially biased) choice of some downstream task, such as segmentation, or adopt task-independent perceptual metrics (e.g. ...
, Fréchet Inception Distance/FID) from natural imaging, which we show insufficiently capture anatomical features. To this end, we introduce a new perceptual metric tailored for medical images, FRD (Fréchet Radiomic Distance), which utilizes standardized, clinically meaningful, and interpretable image features. We show that FRD is superior to other image distribution metrics for a range of medical imaging applications, including out-of-domain (OOD) detection, the evaluation of image-to-image translation (by correlating more with downstream task performance as well as anatomical consistency and realism), and the evaluation of unconditional image generation. Moreover, FRD offers additional benefits such as stability and computational efficiency at low sample sizes, sensitivity to image corruptions and adversarial attacks, feature interpretability, and correlation with radiologist-perceived image quality. Additionally, we address key gaps in the literature by presenting an extensive framework for the multifaceted evaluation of image similarity metrics in medical imaging -- including the first large-scale comparative study of generative models for medical image translation -- and release an accessible codebase to facilitate future research. Our results are supported by thorough experiments spanning a variety of datasets, modalities, and downstream tasks, highlighting the broad potential of FRD for medical image analysis.
Results & Benchmarks
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Determining whether two sets of images belong to the same or different distributions or domains is a crucial task in modern medical image analysis and deep learning; for example, to evaluate the output quality of image generative models.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: A rail network performance metric to capture passenger experience.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
0
Citations
62
References
Tasks
Metric (unit), Domain (mathematical analysis), Computer science, Physical Sciences
Methods
None detected
Domains
Distribution (mathematics), Image (mathematics), Artificial intelligence, Mathematics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Related papers
-
Search on Paper2Code
A rail network performance metric to capture passenger experience (2019) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Reliance on Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Deep Learning in the Era of Industry 4.0 (2021) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
An Object Detection and Pose Estimation Approach for Position Based Visual Servoing (2017) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Robotics architectures based machine learning and deep learning approaches (2022) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Automated system for classification of COVID-19 infection from lung CT images based on machine learning and deep learning techniques (2022) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Significance of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Development of Artificial Intelligence (2022) Semantic similarity
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.