Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Natural language processing
GPT-2 (from scratch)
Epoch 1
0.946
Source: paper fulltext
Natural language processing
LLaMA-13B (LoRA)
Epoch 1
0.457
Source: paper fulltext
Natural language processing
LLaMA-70B (LoRA)
Epoch 1
0.402
Source: paper fulltext
Natural language processing
Random
1 Iter
13.46
Source: paper fulltext
Natural language processing
Pre-trained
1 Iter
1.57
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

5 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Natural language processing GPT-2 (from scratch) Epoch 1 0.946 paper-derived No explicit refs
Natural language processing LLaMA-13B (LoRA) Epoch 1 0.457 paper-derived No explicit refs
Natural language processing LLaMA-70B (LoRA) Epoch 1 0.402 paper-derived No explicit refs
Natural language processing Random 1 Iter 13.46 paper-derived No explicit refs
Natural language processing Pre-trained 1 Iter 1.57 paper-derived No explicit refs

Fine-Tuned Language Models Generate Stable Inorganic Materials as Text is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

facebookresearch/flowmm is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Strong overlap with paper title keywords). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 186 GitHub stars.

Open facebookresearch/crystal-llm

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

facebookresearch/crystal-llm
historical official
Maintenance: Archived
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
122
Last push
Jun 18, 2024 (732d ago)

Risk flags

  • Repository archived
  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Strong

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
0
Last push
Jun 18, 2026 (2d ago)
CIDependencies

Risk flags

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

facebookresearch/crystal-llm
Historical official
Stars: 122
Last push: Jun 18, 2024
Archived
  • Only historical official repository was found: facebookresearch/crystal-llm.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 18, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repository archived — fork required

  • · facebookresearch/crystal-llm has been archived. Fork the repository before using it.
  • · No further updates or bug fixes will be made by the original authors.
Open facebookresearch/crystal-llm

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Natural language processing

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.