Ankur Sinha, Chaitanya Agarwal, Pekka Malo
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Large language models (LLMs) excel at generating human-like responses but often struggle with interactive tasks that require access to real-time information. This limitation poses challenges in finance, where models must access up-to-date information, such as recent news or price movements, to support decision-making. To address this, we introduce Financial Agent, a knowledge-grounding approach for LLMs to handle fin ...
ancial queries using real-time text and tabular data. Our contributions are threefold: First, we develop a Financial Context Dataset of over 50,000 financial queries paired with the required context. Second, we develop FinBloom 7B, a custom 7 billion parameter LLM, by fine-tuning Bloom 7B on 14 million financial news articles from Reuters and Deutsche Presse-Agentur (DPA), alongside a random sample of 25% from 12 million Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. Third, we fine-tune FinBloom 7B using the Financial Context Dataset to serve as a Financial Agent. This agent generates relevant financial context, enabling efficient real-time data retrieval to answer user queries. By reducing latency and eliminating the need for users to manually provide accurate data, our approach significantly enhances the capability of LLMs to handle dynamic financial tasks. Our proposed approach makes real-time financial decisions, algorithmic trading and other related tasks streamlined, and is valuable in contexts with high-velocity data flows.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification | FinRoBERTa (RoBERTa-large, domain-adapted) | F1 Score | 0.7674 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Classification | FinBERT | F1 Score | 0.5098 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Classification | RoBERTa-large | F1 Score | 0.4258 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Computer science | models fine-tuned on Financial Context | Perplexity | 6 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Computer science | Bloom 7B | ROUGE-1 | 0.8947 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Computer science | FinBloom 7B | ROUGE-1 | 0.9774 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Large language models (LLMs) excel at generating human-like responses but often struggle with interactive tasks that require access to real-time information.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
0
Citations
15
References
Tasks
Computer science, Context (archaeology), Financial market, Commission, Financial transaction, Big data, Financial services, Financial instrument
Methods
Financial modeling, Language model, Data modeling, Topic model
Domains
Finance, Latency (audio), Machine learning
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.