How reproducible is "Feedback Network for Image Super-Resolution"?

Estimated time to first reproduction: a few days. Risk flags: Only historical official implementation is available. Only historical official repository was found (Paper99/SRFBN_CVPR19).

Are there pretrained models available for "Feedback Network for Image Super-Resolution"?

Yes, 1 Hugging Face model found. The top result is keras-io/super-resolution with 10 downloads.

What framework is used to implement "Feedback Network for Image Super-Resolution"?

The primary implementation uses pytorch.

Feedback Network for Image Super-Resolution

Published: Mar 1, 2019

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Evidence: Historical

Domain fit: AI-adjacent

Verified repos: 1

Top repo stars: 552

Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Framework: pytorch

Time to first repro: a few days

1 risk flag

arXiv PDF

Technical details

Canonical key: arxiv-1903.09814

Cache status: Fresh

Generated at: Jun 20, 2026, 5:43 AM

Artifact coverage: curated_related

HF provider: ok (token)

PWC source used: Yes

LLM status: not_generated

LLM model: n/a

LLM generated: Unknown

LLM content type: n/a

HF policy: hf-relevance-v27

implementation starting point

Benchmarks: missing

Time to repro: a few days

1 risk flag

pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold

Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Feedback Network for Image Super-Resolution is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (Paper99/SRFBN_CVPR19).

Open Paper99/SRFBN_CVPR19

Reproduction Risks

Only historical official implementation is available
No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 2 links.

Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Paper99/SRFBN_CVPR19

historical official

Maintenance: Stale

Confidence: High

Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars: 552
Last push: Dec 17, 2019 (2378d ago)

Risk flags

No push in 12+ months
No CI pipeline detected
No tagged releases

jiajunhua/extreme-assistant-cvpr2019

alternative

Maintenance: Stale

Confidence: Low

Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

Stars: 8
Last push: May 11, 2019 (2597d ago)

Risk flags

No push in 12+ months
No CI pipeline detected
No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

Paper99/SRFBN_CVPR19

Historical official

Stars: 552

Last push: Dec 17, 2019

Only historical official repository was found: Paper99/SRFBN_CVPR19.
No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work

Time to first repro: days

Last checked: Jun 20, 2026

Hardware requirements

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

· Paper99/SRFBN_CVPR19 has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
· You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
· Last push was 2378 days ago.

Open Paper99/SRFBN_CVPR19

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.