Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Literature Review
MNIST
Accuracy
400
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Literature Review MNIST Accuracy 400 paper-derived No explicit refs

Feature Selection and Feature Extraction in Pattern Analysis: A Literature Review is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (bghojogh/Feature-Extraction-Survey).

Open bghojogh/Feature-Extraction-Survey

Reproduction Risks

  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
7
Last push
Oct 16, 2020 (2116d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
4
Last push
Mar 4, 2021 (1977d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

bghojogh/Feature-Extraction-Survey
Historical official
Stars: 7
Last push: Oct 16, 2020
  • Only historical official repository was found: bghojogh/Feature-Extraction-Survey.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jul 26, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · bghojogh/Feature-Extraction-Survey has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 2116 days ago.
Open bghojogh/Feature-Extraction-Survey

Additional implementations

Official

  • Feature selection and feature extraction code implementation from the paper Feature Selection and Feature Extraction in Pattern Analysis: A Literature Review. Link -> https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02845

    Stars: 4
    Forks: 1
    Last push: Mar 4, 2021

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Literature Review

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.