Faster Configuration Performance Bug Testing with Neural Dual-Level Prioritization
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
As software systems become more complex and configurable, more performance problems tend to arise from the configuration designs. This has caused some configuration options to unexpectedly degrade performance which deviates from their original expectations designed by the developers. Such discrepancies, namely configuration performance bugs (CPBugs), are devastating and can be deeply hidden in the source code. Yet, efficiently testing CPBugs is difficult, not only due to the test oracle is hard to set, but also because the configuration measurement is expensive and there are simply too many possible configurations to test. As such, existing testing tools suffer from lengthy runtime or have been ineffective in detecting CPBugs when the budget is limited, compounded by inaccurate test oracle. In this paper, we seek to achieve significantly faster CPBug testing by neurally prioritizing the testing at both the configuration option and value range levels with automated oracle estimation. Our proposed tool, dubbed NDP, is a general framework that works with different heuristic generators. The idea is to leverage two neural language models: one to estimate the CPBug types that serve as the oracle while, more vitally, the other to infer the probabilities of an option being CPBug-related, based on which the options and the value ranges to be searched can be prioritized. Experiments on several widely-used systems of different versions reveal that NDP can, in general, better predict CPBug type in 87 % cases and find more CPBugs with up to <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$88.88 \times$</tex> testing efficiency speedup over the state-of-the-art tools.
Results and benchmarks
As software systems become more complex and configurable, more performance problems tend to arise from the configuration designs.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 70/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.
- Compare repo methods against the paper equations/algorithm before trusting metrics.
- Create a minimal baseline implementation from the paper and use adjacent repos as references.
Time to first repro: a few days
charlax/professional-programming is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matches contextual method/domain keyword: software). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 51443 GitHub stars.
- Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
- Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Closest related implementations
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
- charlax/professional-programming Adjacent · Confidence: Medium · 51,443 stars
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: software
- akullpp/awesome-java Adjacent · Confidence: Medium · 48,832 stars
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: software
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Datasets
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
4
Citations
53
References
Tasks
Prioritization, Computer science, Dual (grammatical number), Software performance testing, Reliability engineering, Software, Physical Sciences
Methods
Transformer
Domains
None detected
Related papers
- ИСПОЛЬЗОВAНИЕ ПОТЕНЦИAЛA СОЦИAЛЬНЫХ ПAРТНЕРОВ В ПОДГОТОВКЕ БУДУЩИХ ПЕДAГОГОВSearch on Paper2Code
2024 · Semantic similarity
- DETERMINING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AT THE UNIVERSITIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATIONSearch on Paper2Code
2018 · Semantic similarity
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"Search on Paper2Code
2017 · Semantic similarity
- Establishing conservation priorities for crop wild relatives.Search on Paper2Code
2007 · Semantic similarity
- To Be or Not to Be Relevant: Comparing Short- and Long-Term Consequences Across Working Memory Prioritization ProceduresSearch on Paper2Code
2022 · Semantic similarity
- To be or not to be relevant: Comparing short- and long-term consequences across working memory prioritization proceduresSearch on Paper2Code
2023 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.