Official implementation from Papers with Code · Partial overlap with paper title keywords
- Stars
- 80
- Last push
- Jun 5, 2026 (15d ago)
Risk flags
- No Docker setup
Philip Loche, Kevin K. Huguenin-Dumittan, Melika Honarmand, Qianjun Xu, Egor Rumiantsev, Wei Bin How, Marcel F. Langer, Michele Ceriotti
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Most atomistic machine learning (ML) models rely on a locality ansatz, and decompose the energy into a sum of short-ranged, atom-centered contributions. This leads to clear limitations when trying to describe problems that are dominated by long-range physical effects - most notably electrostatics. Many approaches have been proposed to overcome these limitations, but efforts to make them efficient and widely available ...
are hampered by the need to incorporate an ad hoc implementation of methods to treat long-range interactions. We develop a framework aiming to bring some of the established algorithms to evaluate non-bonded interactions - including Ewald summation, classical particle-mesh Ewald (PME), and particle-particle/particle-mesh (P3M) Ewald - into atomistic ML. We provide a reference implementation for pyTorch as well as an experimental one for JAX. Beyond Coulomb and more general long-range potentials, we introduce purified descriptors which disregard the immediate neighborhood of each atom, and are more suitable for general long-ranged ML applications. Our implementations are fast, feature-rich, and modular: They provide an accurate evaluation of physical long-range forces that can be used in the construction of (semi)empirical baseline potentials; they exploit the availability of automatic differentiation to seamlessly combine long-range models with conventional, local ML schemes; and they are sufficiently flexible to implement more complex architectures that use physical interactions as building blocks. We benchmark and demonstrate our torch-pme and jax-pme libraries to perform molecular dynamics simulations, to train ML potentials, and to evaluate long-range equivariant descriptors of atomic structures.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Most atomistic machine learning (ML) models rely on a locality ansatz, and decompose the energy into a sum of short-ranged, atom-centered contributions.
lab-cosmo/torch-pme is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (BSD-3-Clause).
Open lab-cosmo/torch-pmeEvidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Partial overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Particle-mesh based calculations of long-range interactions in PyTorch
Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.
Ready to reproduce
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/lab-cosmo/torch-pme.git
pip install -e . No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
Auxiliary Code Repository for 'Fast and flexible range-separated models for atomistic machine learning'
No additional community repositories detected yet.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
No trustworthy model matches right now.
Search models on Hugging FaceBroaden dataset search
No trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceTasks
Scientific computing
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.