Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectives

Q: How reproducible is "Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectives"?

Estimated time to first reproduction: a few days. Risk flags: Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified. No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.

Q: What framework is used to implement "Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectives"?

The primary implementation uses pytorch.

Published Nov 1, 2022

arXiv PDF

Researcher verdict

Starting point

Use as implementation starting point

Benchmark evidence

Missing

Not verified yet

Time to first repro

A few days

Plan setup time

Risk flags

Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold

Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectives is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Benchmark evidence is limited

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Only a historical official implementation is available

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

vqassessment/dover · 521 stars · Last push Aug 12, 2024

Why this implementation

Confidence: low

VQAssessment/FAST-VQA-and-FasterVQA is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Community adoption signal (350 stars)). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 350 GitHub stars.

Open vqassessment/dover

Reproduction risks

Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Only historical official repository was found: vqassessment/dover.
No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

vqassessment/dover

historical official

Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong
Stars: 521
Last push: Aug 12, 2024 (743d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

No push in 12+ months
No Docker setup

QualityAssessment/DOVER

alternative

Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong
Stars: 521
Last push: Aug 12, 2024 (743d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

No push in 12+ months
No Docker setup

HappyAIWalker/ICCV2023-paper-code

alternative

Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited
Stars: 18
Last push: Aug 12, 2023 (1110d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

No push in 12+ months
No CI pipeline detected
No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days

Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

vqassessment/dover has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
Last push was 743 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.

Open vqassessment/dover

Hardware requirements

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/vqassessment/dover.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Validation caveat

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Repositories and ecosystem

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

VQAssessment/FAST-VQA-and-FasterVQA Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 350 stars

Community adoption signal (350 stars)

Official

QualityAssessment/DOVER
Confidence: High

[ICCV 2023, Official Code] for paper "Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectives". Official Weights and Demos provided.

521 stars · 57 forks · Last push Aug 12, 2024 · NOASSERTION license

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Models

arxiv:2211.04894 Computer vision

Datasets

arxiv:2211.04894 Computer vision dataset

Spaces

arxiv:2211.04894 Computer vision demo

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

None detected

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.