Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Exploring Opinion-unaware Video Quality Assessment with Semantic Affinity Criterion

Published Feb 1, 2023
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Exploring Opinion-unaware Video Quality Assessment with Semantic Affinity Criterion is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

vqassessment/bvqi is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Official implementation from Papers with Code). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 41 GitHub stars.

Open qualityassessment/bvqi
Reproduction risks
  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: qualityassessment/bvqi.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

qualityassessment/bvqi
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
41
Last push
Jul 11, 2023 (1143d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
vqassessment/bvqi
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
41
Last push
Jul 11, 2023 (1143d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (41 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 26, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • qualityassessment/bvqi has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 1143 days ago.
Open qualityassessment/bvqi

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

  • vqassessment/bvqi Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 41 stars

    Official implementation from Papers with Code

Official

  • vqassessment/bvqi
    Confidence: Medium

    [ICME 2023 Oral, Extended to TIP (UR)] The best zero-shot VQA approach that even outperforms several fully-supervised methods.

    41 stars · 4 forks · Last push Jul 11, 2023 · MIT license

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

None detected

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Computer vision

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).