Explanations Based on Item Response Theory (eXirt): A Model-Specific Method to Explain Tree-Ensemble Model in Trust Perspective
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
In recent years, XAI researchers have been formalizing proposals and developing new methods to explain black box models, with no general consensus in the community on which method to use to explain these models, with this choice being almost directly linked to the popularity of a specific method. Methods such as Ciu, Dalex, Eli5, Lofo, Shap and Skater emerged with the proposal to explain black box models through global rankings of feature relevance, which based on different methodologies, generate global explanations that indicate how the model's inputs explain its predictions. In this context, 41 datasets, 4 tree-ensemble algorithms (Light Gradient Boosting, CatBoost, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting), and 6 XAI methods were used to support the launch of a new XAI method, called eXirt, based on Item Response Theory - IRT and aimed at tree-ensemble black box models that use tabular data referring to binary classification problems. In the first set of analyses, the 164 global feature relevance ranks of the eXirt were compared with 984 ranks of the other XAI methods present in the literature, seeking to highlight their similarities and differences. In a second analysis, exclusive explanations of the eXirt based on Explanation-by-example were presented that help in understanding the model trust. Thus, it was verified that eXirt is able to generate global explanations of tree-ensemble models and also local explanations of instances of models through IRT, showing how this consolidated theory can be used in machine learning in order to obtain explainable and reliable models.
Results and benchmarks
In recent years, XAI researchers have been formalizing proposals and developing new methods to explain black box models, with no general consensus in the community on which method to use to explain these models, with this choice being almost directly linked to the popularity of a specific method.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation
Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)
Only a historical official implementation is available
Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.
josesousaribeiro/exirt · 1 stars · Last push Oct 31, 2024
Only historical official repository was found (josesousaribeiro/exirt).
Open josesousaribeiro/exirt- Only historical official implementation is available
- No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
- Only historical official repository was found: josesousaribeiro/exirt.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 1
- Last push
- Oct 31, 2024 (664d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- Jun 11, 2024 (806d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- Jun 11, 2024 (806d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Reproduction readiness
Major work
No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required
- josesousaribeiro/exirt has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
- You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
- Last push was 664 days ago.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Repositories and ecosystem
Official
- josesousaribeiro/exirt-xai-benchmarkConfidence: High
This is a repository for reproducibility purposes. In this research, a large number of datasets were used to create different ML models, which were then explained by XAI measures. Proposing a new measure of XAI called eXirt.
0 stars · 2 forks · Last push Jun 11, 2024 · CC0-1.0 license
- josesousaribeiro/exirt-xai-pipelineConfidence: High
This is a repository for reproducibility purposes. In this research, a large number of datasets were used to create different ML models, which were then explained by XAI measures. Proposing a new measure of XAI called eXirt.
0 stars · 2 forks · Last push Jun 11, 2024 · CC0-1.0 license
Community
No additional community repositories detected yet.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- Fadygamea/exirt1
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
5
Citations
81
References
Tasks
Computer science, Relevance (law), Perspective (graphical), Random forest, Tree (set theory), Ensemble learning, Context (archaeology), Feature (linguistics)
Methods
None detected
Domains
Boosting (machine learning), Machine learning, Artificial intelligence
Related papers
- Gradient Boosting Machine: A SurveySearch on Paper2Code
2019 · Semantic similarity
- GBMVis: Visual Analytics for Interpreting Gradient Boosting MachineSearch on Paper2Code
2021 · Semantic similarity
- On Application of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Failures in Production LinesSearch on Paper2Code
2021 · Semantic similarity
- Proximal boosting: aggregating weak learners to minimize non-differentiable lossesSearch on Paper2Code
2018 · Semantic similarity
- Accelerated proximal boostingSearch on Paper2Code
2018 · Semantic similarity
- Calibrated Boosting-ForestSearch on Paper2Code
2017 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).