Evidence-Grounded Subspecialty Reasoning: Evaluating a Curated Clinical Intelligence Layer on the 2025 Endocrinology Board-Style Examination
Amir Hosseinian, MohammadReza Zare Shahneh, Umer Mansoor, Gilbert Szeto, Kirill Karlin +1 more
Abstract
Background: Large language models have demonstrated strong performance on general medical examinations, but subspecialty clinical reasoning remains challenging due to rapidly evolving guidelines and nuanced evidence hierarchies. Methods: We evaluated January Mirror, an evidence-grounded clinical reasoning system, against frontier LLMs (GPT-5, GPT-5.2, Gemini-3-Pro) on a 120-question endocrinology board-style examinat...
Results & Benchmarks
Benchmark data is not yet available for this paper.
Hardware Requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Best Implementation
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the Implementation Status and Reproduction Path sections below for the current action plan.
Reproduction Path
Follow this baseline workflow to decide if this paper is worth immediate prototyping.
- 1
Use the paper and benchmark evidence to scope a baseline reproduction plan.
- 2
Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Additional Implementations
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face Artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches: