Evaluation of direct inversion of proton radiographs in the context of cylindrical implosions
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Direct inversion of deflectometry data, such as proton radiographs and shadowgraphs, is a well-posed problem with a unique solution for the transverse deflection of each particle or ray if their trajectories do not cross. When trajectories cross, there exists an infinite set of solutions. In proton radiography direct inversion determines the line-integrated transverse Lorentz force. We have tested five publicly available direct inversion routines with a view to analyzing proton radiographs of cylindrical implosions on the OMEGA laser; four Monge-Ampère solvers [github.com/flash-center/PRaLine, github.com/flash-center/PROBLEM, github.com/mfkasim1/invert-shadowgraphy/tree/fast-inverse, github.com/OxfordHED/proton-radiography-no-source], and a power-diagram method [github.com/mfkasim1/invert-shadowgraphy]. Test problems were generated using four field profiles, three cylindrical and one spherical, with varying field amplitudes in proton-tracing routines. Two Monge-Ampère solvers did not run, the other two failed to reproduce radiographs when trajectories crossed, although for one field profile the solutions only diverged from the original at the boundary. The power-diagram method was successful even when proton trajectories crossed, giving a solution that minimized proton deflection, but failed for profiles that produced a single, sufficiently sharp peak. For cases where trajectories do not cross, the Monge-Ampère solvers have the advantage of being considerably faster than the power-diagram routine, up to $1000$ times in our tests. The test problems are provided in the supplementary information in pradformat [github.com/phyzicist/pradformat].
Results and benchmarks
Direct inversion of deflectometry data, such as proton radiographs and shadowgraphs, is a well-posed problem with a unique solution for the transverse deflection of each particle or ray if their trajectories do not cross.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)
Only a historical official implementation is available
Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.
phyzicist/pradformat · 2 stars · Last push Feb 4, 2022
Only historical official repository was found (phyzicist/pradformat).
Open phyzicist/pradformat- Only historical official implementation is available
- No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
- Only historical official repository was found: phyzicist/pradformat.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 2
- Last push
- Feb 4, 2022 (1663d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 5
- Last push
- Feb 4, 2021 (2029d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 2
- Last push
- Jul 6, 2018 (2973d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Reproduction readiness
Major work
No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required
- phyzicist/pradformat has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
- You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
- Last push was 1663 days ago.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Official
- flash-center/PROBLEMConfidence: High
PROBLEM Solver (PROton-imaged B-field nonLinear Extraction Module)
5 stars · 2 forks · Last push Feb 4, 2021 · MIT license
- flash-center/PRaLineConfidence: High
PRaLine code (Proton Radiography Linear reconstruction, the "reconstruction" is silent)
2 stars · 2 forks · Last push Jul 6, 2018 · MIT license
- OxfordHED/proton-radiography-no-sourceConfidence: High
Code accompanying the paper "Retrieving fields from proton radiography without source profiles"
2 stars · 2 forks · Last push Sep 13, 2019 · BSD-3-Clause license
- mfkasim1/invert-shadowgraphyConfidence: High
This is matlab codes to invert shadowgraphy or proton radiography images to obtain the deflection of the light beam (or proton beam in proton radiography case).
7 stars · 1 forks · Last push Nov 8, 2018
Community
No additional community repositories detected yet.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXData includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).