Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization

Published Oct 1, 2019
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Summarization BERT+MNLI Accuracy 51.51 paper-derived
Summarization BERT+FEVER Accuracy 52.07 paper-derived
Summarization FactCC (ours) Accuracy 74.15 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (yuhui-zh15/FactCCX).

Open yuhui-zh15/FactCCX
Reproduction risks
  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: yuhui-zh15/FactCCX.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

yuhui-zh15/FactCCX
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
8
Last push
Jul 23, 2023 (1130d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
mcao610/Factual-Error-Correction
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
23
Last push
May 26, 2022 (1552d)

Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
EthicalML/chatbot
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
2
Last push
Dec 26, 2024 (607d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • yuhui-zh15/FactCCX has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 1130 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open yuhui-zh15/FactCCX

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/yuhui-zh15/FactCCX.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Summarization

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Summarization

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).