Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models

Published May 1, 2023
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Computer vision MSCOCO Recall 99.67 paper-derived
Computer vision MiniGPT-4 Recall 78.86 paper-derived
Computer vision -OKVQA Precision 92.24 paper-derived
Computer vision LLaVA Accuracy 99.53 paper-derived
Computer vision InstructBLIP BLEU-1 59.5 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

The official GitHub page for ''Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models''

267 stars · 12 forks · Last push Aug 21, 2025 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

rucaibox/pope is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open rucaibox/pope
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected rucaibox/pope as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

rucaibox/pope
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
267
Last push
Aug 21, 2025 (369d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
aoidragon/pope
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
117
Last push
Aug 21, 2025 (369d)

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (117 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
63
Last push
Mar 13, 2025 (530d)

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (63 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 23, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • rucaibox/pope has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 369 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open rucaibox/pope

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/rucaibox/pope.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Computer vision

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Computer vision, Natural Language Processing

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).