Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Estimating Object Physical Properties from RGB-D Vision and Depth Robot Sensors Using Deep Learning

Ricardo Cardoso, Plinio MorenoPublished Jul 7, 2025
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Inertial mass plays a crucial role in robotic applications such as object grasping, manipulation, and simulation, providing a strong prior for planning and control. Accurately estimating an object's mass before interaction can significantly enhance the performance of various robotic tasks. However, mass estimation using only vision sensors is a relatively underexplored area. This paper proposes a novel approach combining sparse point-cloud data from depth images with RGB images to estimate the mass of objects. We evaluate a range of point-cloud processing architectures, alongside RGB-only methods. To overcome the limited availability of training data, we create a synthetic dataset using ShapeNetSem 3D models, simulating RGBD images via a Kinect camera. This synthetic data is used to train an image generation model for estimating dense depth maps, which we then use to augment an existing dataset of images paired with mass values. Our approach significantly outperforms existing benchmarks across all evaluated metrics. The data generation (https://github.com/RavineWindteer/ShapenetSem-to-RGBD) as well as the training of the depth estimator (https://github.com/RavineWindteer/GLPDepth-Edited) and the mass estimator (https://github.com/RavineWindteer/Depth-mass-estimator) are available online.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Inertial mass plays a crucial role in robotic applications such as object grasping, manipulation, and simulation, providing a strong prior for planning and control.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Scientific computing GLPDepth fine-tune mAPE 0.2028 paper-derived
Scientific computing GLPDepth fine-tune + normalization mAPE 0.0793 paper-derived
Scientific computing GLPDepth Best (20 epoch) mAPE 0.0718 paper-derived
Scientific computing (i2m) Xception k-NN APE 2.762 paper-derived
Scientific computing (i2m) Xception k-NN (SIM) APE 1.14 paper-derived
Scientific computing (i2m) Pure CNN APE 0.711 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (RavineWindteer/Depth-mass-estimator).

Open RavineWindteer/Depth-mass-estimator
Reproduction risks
  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: RavineWindteer/Depth-mass-estimator.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
1
Last push
Mar 21, 2025 (523d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
1
Last push
Mar 21, 2025 (523d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
3
Last push
Apr 17, 2024 (862d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 26, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • RavineWindteer/Depth-mass-estimator has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 523 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open RavineWindteer/Depth-mass-estimator

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/RavineWindteer/Depth-mass-estimator.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

  • RavineWindteer/GLPDepth-Edited

    1 stars · 0 forks · Last push Mar 21, 2025 · MIT license

  • Scripts for batch rendering ShapenetSem models with Kinect RGBD simulation, using Blender.

    3 stars · 0 forks · Last push Apr 17, 2024 · MIT license

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Scientific computing

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).