Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with right-censored data via causal survival forests
Results and benchmarks
Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with right-censored data via causal survival forests is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
Generalized Random Forests
1,106 stars · 282 forks · Last push Apr 30, 2026 · GPL-3.0 license
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Community adoption signal (1106 stars)
grf-labs/grf is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (GPL-3.0).
Open grf-labs/grf- Dependency manifest is missing
- Selected grf-labs/grf as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Includes CI workflow signals.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
Reproduction readiness
Major work
No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required
- grf-labs/grf has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
- You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXData includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).