Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

ERASE: Benchmarking Feature Selection Methods for Deep Recommender Systems

Published Mar 1, 2024
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
ERASE: Benchmarking Feature Selection Methods for Deep Recommender Systems is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Benchmarking Feature Selection Methods Deep Recommender DeepFM Movielens-1M 0.80024 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Code for the Paper "ERASE: Benchmarking Feature Selection Methods for Deep Recommender Systems"

30 stars · 2 forks · Last push Jan 2, 2025 · Apache-2.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

applied-machine-learning-lab/erase is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open applied-machine-learning-lab/erase
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected applied-machine-learning-lab/erase as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
30
Last push
Jan 2, 2025 (600d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
jia-py/erase
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
7
Last push
Apr 14, 2024 (863d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • applied-machine-learning-lab/erase has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 600 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open applied-machine-learning-lab/erase

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/applied-machine-learning-lab/erase.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy models matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

No trustworthy datasets matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Benchmarking Feature Selection Methods Deep Recommender

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).