Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Entity Structure Within and Throughout: Modeling Mention Dependencies for Document-Level Relation Extraction

Published Feb 1, 2021
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Entity Structure Within and Throughout: Modeling Mention Dependencies for Document-Level Relation Extraction is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Modeling Mention Dependencies Document-level Relation Extraction 2017 ) Test F1 61.3 paper-derived
Modeling Mention Dependencies Document-level Relation Extraction BRAN Test F1 62.1 paper-derived
Modeling Mention Dependencies Document-level Relation Extraction CNN+CNNchar Test F1 62.3 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: medium

BenfengXu/SSAN is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Official implementation from Papers with Code). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 82 GitHub stars.

Open PaddlePaddle/Research
Reproduction risks
  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: PaddlePaddle/Research.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

PaddlePaddle/Research
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
1,762
Last push
Aug 16, 2024 (739d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
BenfengXu/SSAN
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
82
Last push
Jul 1, 2022 (1516d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Jul 26, 2022 (1491d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • PaddlePaddle/Research has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 739 days ago.
Open PaddlePaddle/Research

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

  • BenfengXu/SSAN Adjacent · Confidence: Medium · 82 stars

    Official implementation from Papers with Code

Official

  • BenfengXu/SSAN
    Confidence: High

    Implementation for our AAAI2021 paper (Entity Structure Within and Throughout: Modeling Mention Dependencies for Document-Level Relation Extraction).

    82 stars · 18 forks · Last push Jul 1, 2022 · Apache-2.0 license

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Modeling Mention Dependencies Document-level Relation Extraction

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).