Enhancing Moral Diagnosis and Correction in Large Language Models

sks, including moral reasoning, toxic language detection, social bias detection, and jailbreaks, despite substantial differences in their semantic formulations. To enable such generalization, the study also introduces a unifying variable, pragmatic inference load, which captures the degree of pragmatic reasoning required across tasks. Experimental results show that our approach enables LLMs to produce high-quality diagnostic outputs of moral errors, make effective corrections, and consistently outperform a range of baseline methods. Further analyses reveal that these improvements do not arise from heuristic-based response patterns, but from learned inferential processes, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach.