Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security

Published Jan 1, 2022
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (SciEcon/EIP1559).

Open SciEcon/EIP1559
Reproduction risks
  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: SciEcon/EIP1559.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

SciEcon/EIP1559
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
22
Last push
Apr 25, 2023 (1219d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
decensyslab/eip-1559-empirical-study
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
4
Last push
Apr 12, 2022 (1596d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
cs-econ-blockchain/CS-Econ-Glossary
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Jul 7, 2022 (1511d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • SciEcon/EIP1559 has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 1219 days ago.
Open SciEcon/EIP1559

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

  • decensyslab/eip-1559-empirical-study
    Confidence: High

    Data & code for "Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security"

    4 stars · 0 forks · Last push Apr 12, 2022 · MIT license

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).