Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
tf

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Smaller Models Faster Training
CIFAR-100
Accuracy
100
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Smaller Models Faster Training CIFAR-100 Accuracy 100 paper-derived No explicit refs

EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Training is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

rwightman/pytorch-image-models is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 36866 GitHub stars.

Open google/automl

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

google/automl
historical official
Maintenance: Archived
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (6470 stars)

Stars
6,470
Last push
Mar 2, 2025 (464d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • Repository archived
  • No push in 12+ months
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Community adoption signal (83 stars) · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

Stars
83
Last push
Dec 26, 2022 (1260d ago)
ReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Community adoption signal (54 stars)

Stars
54
Last push
Mar 5, 2026 (95d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

google/automl
Historical official
Stars: 6,470
Last push: Mar 2, 2025
Archived
  • Only historical official repository was found: google/automl.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 8, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repository archived — fork required

  • · google/automl has been archived. Fork the repository before using it.
  • · No further updates or bug fixes will be made by the original authors.
Open google/automl

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Smaller Models Faster Training

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.