Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- Stars
- 28
- Last push
- Nov 5, 2020 (2053d ago)
Risk flags
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Language modeling | Penn Treebank | Perplexity | 64.29 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Stochastic optimization | CIFAR-10 | Accuracy | 95.69 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Stochastic optimization | PASCAL VOC | mAP | 81.02 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Stochastic optimization | CIFAR-100 | Accuracy | 0 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Language modeling | Treebank | Adabelief | 84.24 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
EAdam Optimizer: How $ε$ Impact Adam presents a stochastic optimization method.
This is primarily a method paper. Reproduce it within a maintained framework baseline instead of chasing paper-specific repos.
Open yuanwei2019/EAdam-optimizerEvidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 70/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Community adoption signal (181 stars) · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)
Risk flags
Only a historical official implementation is available.
Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.
No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required
Framework baselines
Reference implementation of Adam in PyTorch.
JAX/Flax baseline for Adam variants.
TensorFlow/Keras baseline for Adam.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Language modeling, Stochastic optimization
Methods
Stochastic optimization
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.