Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Classification
BoT-IoT
Accuracy
99.99
Source: paper fulltext
Classification
NF-BoT-IoT
Accuracy
93.57
Source: paper fulltext
Classification
ToN-IoT
Accuracy
97.87
Source: paper fulltext
Classification
XGBoost
F1.
0.99
Source: paper fulltext
Graph Neural Network Based Intrusion Detection
KNN
W-F1.
0.99
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

5 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Classification BoT-IoT Accuracy 99.99 paper-derived No explicit refs
Classification NF-BoT-IoT Accuracy 93.57 paper-derived No explicit refs
Classification ToN-IoT Accuracy 97.87 paper-derived No explicit refs
Classification XGBoost F1. 0.99 paper-derived No explicit refs
Graph Neural Network Based Intrusion Detection KNN W-F1. 0.99 paper-derived No explicit refs

E-GraphSAGE: A Graph Neural Network based Intrusion Detection System for IoT is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

George730/E-ResGAT is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Strong overlap with paper title keywords). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 80 GitHub stars.

Open waimorris/E-GraphSAGE

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

waimorris/E-GraphSAGE
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (109 stars)

Stars
109
Last push
Jun 30, 2022 (1449d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
1
Last push
May 21, 2026 (28d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

waimorris/E-GraphSAGE
Historical official
Stars: 109
Last push: Jun 30, 2022
  • Only historical official repository was found: waimorris/E-GraphSAGE.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 16, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · waimorris/E-GraphSAGE has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 1449 days ago.
Open waimorris/E-GraphSAGE

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Classification, Graph Neural Network Based Intrusion Detection

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.