Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Dual-Slot: From Serial Loops to Parallel Slots in Language Models

Yiqin Hao, Zitong Wang, Boyi Zeng, He Li, Shixiang Song +3 morePublished Oct 18, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Looped language models increase computational depth by repeatedly applying shared layers, offering a way to improve model quality without adding parameters. However, sequential dependencies between loop iterations increase autoregressive decoding latency. We introduce Dual-Slot, an architecture that reorganizes serial looped computation into parallel latent and prediction slots. Rather than waiting for the current token's latent computation to finish, the prediction slot combines the previous token's deep latent state with the current representation, while the latent slot produces a state for the next decoding step. This shifts the latent dependency across adjacent tokens, replacing two sequential module invocations with a single paired invocation while preserving standard autoregressive generation. To preserve token-level parallelism during training, we use a small number of Jacobi iterations to refine latent states across the sequence in parallel. Experiments on Qwen-style dense and mixture-of-experts (MoE) models show consistent improvements in language modeling and average downstream accuracy. On the 1B dense model, Dual-Slot reduces Pile validation perplexity from 7.25 to 7.00 and improves average five-shot accuracy across nine task configurations by 2.26 percentage points. After supervised fine-tuning, it improves zero-shot GSM8K accuracy by 5.83 and 3.49 percentage points for the 1B dense and A0.6B MoE models, respectively. Across the evaluated batch sizes, Dual-Slot retains 93.1-96.5% of vanilla decoding throughput for the dense model and 98.1-99.6% for the MoE model.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Looped language models increase computational depth by repeatedly applying shared layers, offering a way to improve model quality without adding parameters.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 22, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Language modeling, Natural language processing

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.