Dual-Slot: From Serial Loops to Parallel Slots in Language Models
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Looped language models increase computational depth by repeatedly applying shared layers, offering a way to improve model quality without adding parameters. However, sequential dependencies between loop iterations increase autoregressive decoding latency. We introduce Dual-Slot, an architecture that reorganizes serial looped computation into parallel latent and prediction slots. Rather than waiting for the current token's latent computation to finish, the prediction slot combines the previous token's deep latent state with the current representation, while the latent slot produces a state for the next decoding step. This shifts the latent dependency across adjacent tokens, replacing two sequential module invocations with a single paired invocation while preserving standard autoregressive generation. To preserve token-level parallelism during training, we use a small number of Jacobi iterations to refine latent states across the sequence in parallel. Experiments on Qwen-style dense and mixture-of-experts (MoE) models show consistent improvements in language modeling and average downstream accuracy. On the 1B dense model, Dual-Slot reduces Pile validation perplexity from 7.25 to 7.00 and improves average five-shot accuracy across nine task configurations by 2.26 percentage points. After supervised fine-tuning, it improves zero-shot GSM8K accuracy by 5.83 and 3.49 percentage points for the 1B dense and A0.6B MoE models, respectively. Across the evaluated batch sizes, Dual-Slot retains 93.1-96.5% of vanilla decoding throughput for the dense model and 98.1-99.6% for the MoE model.
Results and benchmarks
Looped language models increase computational depth by repeatedly applying shared layers, offering a way to improve model quality without adding parameters.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Language modeling, Natural language processing
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.